| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
PROPERTY TAX REVENUES |
|
|
PROPERTY TAX REVENUES (per Capita) |
|
| |
City |
FY 2005-06 |
FY 2006-07 |
% Change |
|
City |
FY 2005-06 |
FY 2006-07 |
% Change |
1 |
Oakland |
$ 268,693,000 |
$ 317,666,000 |
18.23% |
1 |
Emeryville |
$ 3,170.88 |
$ 3,448.39 |
8.75% |
2 |
Fremont |
$ 83,462,380 |
$ 90,038,824 |
7.88% |
2 |
Piedmont |
$ 794.55 |
$ 825.18 |
3.86% |
3 |
Berkeley |
$ 80,401,752 |
$ 85,334,624 |
6.14% |
3 |
Berkeley |
$ 764.23 |
$ 804.21 |
5.23% |
4 |
Pleasanton |
$ 41,257,246 |
$ 45,341,149 |
9.90% |
4 |
Oakland |
$ 654.37 |
$ 766.35 |
17.11% |
5 |
UNION CITY |
$ 34,247,619 |
$ 45,109,573 |
31.72% |
5 |
Pleasanton |
$ 609.16 |
$ 661.27 |
8.55% |
6 |
Alameda |
$ 33,361,482 |
$ 38,072,398 |
14.12% |
6 |
UNION CITY |
$ 482.20 |
$ 625.44 |
29.71% |
7 |
Hayward |
$ 31,286,714 |
$ 37,038,181 |
18.38% |
7 |
Albany |
$ 505.89 |
$ 583.76 |
15.39% |
8 |
Emeryville |
$ 27,015,926 |
$ 31,507,974 |
16.63% |
8 |
Alameda |
$ 448.29 |
$ 507.11 |
13.12% |
9 |
Livermore |
$ 24,405,940 |
$ 27,640,713 |
13.25% |
9 |
Dublin |
$ 403.85 |
$ 464.91 |
15.12% |
10 |
San Leandro |
$ 21,167,178 |
$ 24,742,722 |
16.89% |
10 |
Fremont |
$ 397.86 |
$ 426.40 |
7.17% |
11 |
Dublin |
$ 16,891,670 |
$ 20,266,216 |
19.98% |
11 |
Livermore |
$ 300.21 |
$ 334.45 |
11.40% |
12 |
Albany |
$ 8,422,013 |
$ 9,761,603 |
15.91% |
12 |
San Leandro |
$ 261.56 |
$ 304.44 |
16.40% |
13 |
Newark |
$ 9,174,446 |
$ 9,312,883 |
1.51% |
13 |
Hayward |
$ 214.09 |
$ 251.10 |
17.29% |
14 |
Piedmont |
$ 8,723,371 |
$ 9,100,928 |
4.33% |
14 |
Newark |
$ 211.36 |
$ 213.66 |
1.09% |
| |
Average |
$ 49,179,338 |
$ 56,495,271 |
13.92% |
|
Average |
$ 658.46 |
$ 729.76 |
12.16% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RESULTS SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
High Agency |
Oakland |
Oakland |
Union City |
|
|
Emeryville |
Emeryville |
Union City |
| |
Low Agency |
Albany |
Piedmont |
Newark |
|
|
Newark |
Newark |
Newark |
| |
Union City Rank |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
7 |
6 |
1 |
| |
Source(s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1) Statement of Activities-Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) ( Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2007) from each city in county. |
| |
2) Statement of Activities-Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) ( Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2006) from each city in county. |
| |
Note(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1) In FY 2006-07, Only $17,018,100 in Property Tax revenues went into the City's General Fund which can be used for General Operating |
| |
Purposes. $28,091,473 went into other funds such as RDA which have specific legal purposes that are usually capital improvement |
| |
related. In FY 2005-06, $15,199,527 went into the General Fund and $19,048,092 went into other funds. |
|
| |
2) FY 2007-08 data will not be available until December 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|